After all, I had travelled to Southeast Asia before and I never felt anything but love for the countries and the people I had visited. I was an intercultural studies student, and thought I was prepared to face anything that came my way with nothing but tolerance and acceptance. I was, in my mind, a global citizen, not held back by my nationality because I was primarily a citizen of the world, not my birth place. Instead I was spurred by the idea that my responsibility was to all humanity, not just those who shared the same passport as me.
Even though I believed in the idea of global citizenship, and believed I was a global citizen, not tied down by the cultural norms of my home country, there I was, on a hot day in Bangkok, acting upon my cultural assumptions and yelling at a customer service agent while accusing him of lying to me. The problem was that while I was used to direct communication from my home country, meaning people generally spoke their minds and spoke in a straight line, in Thailand the use of indirect communication is common. They prefer to speak in circles, favoring to save face rather than speaking straight. I knew this going in, and yet my cultural identity was so strong that I lost it when confronted with a situation that would have played out very differently in the Western society that I was used to.
This incident, while not one of my finest moments, has since caused me to reflect on what global citizenship really means, and whether it is truly achievable. While I still truly believe that we all have responsibility to all of humanity, I am not so sure anymore that I can be a citizen of the world above being a citizen of the country I was born in, and I’m not sure it is necessary. The one trait of global citizenship that I still believe in, and will always believe in, is that even though we can still be defined by the things that are important to us, including a love for our country, we need to learn to see humanity wherever it may appear, despite the differences there may be. However, I’m not sure that I need to be considered a citizen of the world over a citizen of my birth country in order to achieve this. I have discovered that I can care about humanity on deep level, I can care for orphans, teach English to impoverished children, and care deeply about the injustices I see in the world, all while remaining deeply rooted and proud of my home culture.
In the past, the idea of world citizenship was held mostly by an elite set, those who had the money to travel the world. As I reflect on this, I wonder if global citizenship is a Western construct, thought up by those who have the money to travel and experience the world. I have travelled extensively through Southeast Asia and China, and in all my travels I have never had anyone who wasn’t from a Western background bring up the topic.
I will most likely no longer refer to myself as a global citizen, and I believe that there is no need to distance ourselves from the countries of our birth to embrace a citizenship to the world as a whole. That being said, I do however, believe the world would be a better place if we started to care about all of humanity, and see the beauty in our differences instead of fearing them or being indifferent. I am not so sure global citizenship is necessary; instead I propose global responsibility, and the possibility that the world can become a better place because there are people all over the world who care about humanity as a whole.
Angela Schulz is a former expat in Bangkok, now a Masters student studying Intercultural and International communication in her home country of Canada. She loves to travel and is passionate about social justice.
If you are an InterNations member and would like to contribute an article, do not hesitate to contact us!